Transaction Cost Analysis
A trade-level review of FX pricing, spreads, forward points, timestamps, trade size, counterparty behavior, and execution patterns so finance can see what may be embedded in the current process.
Measure what your FX process is really costing before changing providers, negotiating pricing, or making execution decisions.
Bastion separates trade-level cost analysis from broader FX advisory so finance teams can see both the pricing issue and the process issue. The goal is not just to find a cheaper quote. It is to understand how spreads, timing, trade size, counterparties, approvals, policy, and reporting affect the full FX workflow.
A trade-level review of FX pricing, spreads, forward points, timestamps, trade size, counterparty behavior, and execution patterns so finance can see what may be embedded in the current process.
On-demand market interpretation, exposure discussion, policy support, execution planning, and practical decision support for companies with recurring currency exposure.
A structured review of FX transactions to estimate explicit and embedded costs, benchmark counterparties where data allows, and identify process changes that improve pricing transparency and governance.
Companies with recurring FX trades, meaningful USD/CAD or cross-currency volume, forward contracts, multiple providers, unclear markup disclosure, or uncertainty about whether current pricing is fair.
Trade confirmations, timestamps, currency pairs, trade sizes, settlement dates, forward details, counterparty names, pricing agreements, and available market references.
If a company converts millions of dollars per year, a few basis points of hidden or unmanaged markup can become material very quickly. TCA helps quantify the cost, identify the source, and support better negotiation, provider review, policy design, or execution governance.
Any savings estimate should be treated as an analytical estimate, not a guarantee. Actual outcomes depend on market conditions, credit, liquidity, trade size, timing, counterparty terms, and execution.
| Annual FX volume | Potential avoidable cost | Why review matters |
|---|---|---|
| $10 million | 10 bps equals about $10,000 | Good governance and pricing discipline |
| $50 million | 10 bps equals about $50,000 | Counterparty comparison matters |
| $100 million | 10 bps equals about $100,000 | Process, timing, and policy become material |
Estimate the apparent spread or markup using available market references and transaction details.
Compare pricing and execution patterns across banks, brokers, or providers where data allows.
Review spot spreads, timing, size, currency-pair behavior, and consistency with agreed pricing.
Assess whether forward pricing is transparent, consistent with market inputs, and explainable to finance.
Review complexity, embedded cost, and valuation logic where applicable and subject to legal or suitability review.
Summarize practical controls, approvals, provider review cadence, and reporting improvements.
Start by measuring the cost, then fix the process that creates it.